How Meta is reworking its performance review system

By Georgia Greetham
Share this article
Share this article
Prioritise Us on Google
Mark Zuckerberg, Meta CEO (Credit: Meta)
Meta is redeveloping the way it approaches performance reviews to simplify feedback, refocus HR time and reward high performers

Meta is changing its performance review system to create a more straightforward feedback structure and better incentivise high achievers.

A memo seen by Business Insider sets out how the company is reworking its review process and bonuses, with the stated aim of simplifying how performance is reviewed and encouraging top achievers with higher bonuses.

For senior HR leaders, the changes present a clear signal about how Meta frames performance management, reward differentiation and workforce culture at scale.

The changes come into effect by mid 2026 and apply across the organisation.

Business Insider reports that the company is introducing a new structure that links performance ratings more directly to business outcomes.

From an HR perspective, the move centres on clarity, time efficiency and sharper financial incentives. The system prioritises contribution to outcomes over broad behavioural assessment, aligning reward with impact.

Youtube Placeholder

Incentivising top performers

The new system, named Checkpoint, introduces four performance ratings: outstanding, excellent, needs improvement and not meeting expectations. 

The memo explains that the programme rewards employees based on their contribution to business outcomes, with ‘outstanding’ employees delivering an ‘outsized impact’ to Meta. 

Under Checkpoint, the four ratings operate with defined proportions and bonus multipliers. Outstanding applies to the top 20% of Meta’s workforce. These employees receive a 200% multiplier on their base bonus for delivering an ‘outsized impact’.

Excellent covers 70% of employees and is described in the memo as the ‘high culture performance baseline’. This group receives a 115% individual multiplier on their base bonus.

Needs improvement is expected to apply to around 7% of employees and delivers a 50% individual multiplier. Not meeting expectations applies to the bottom 3% of employees and carries a 0% multiplier.

Alongside this structure sits the Meta Award. Business Insider reports that a small number of employees who deliver a ‘truly exceptional impact’ are eligible to receive this award, which provides a 300% individual multiplier to base bonuses.

For HR leaders, this represents a clear example of extreme differentiation in reward strategy, designed to create a stronger incentive for top performers.

Checkpoint introduces four performance ratings (Credit: Getty)

Simplifying the review process to reduce HR load

Checkpoint also responds to the operational burden of performance management.

According to the memo, managers previously spent around 80 hours per year on performance related tasks, while employees spend 330,000 hours per year on peer feedback.

For HR functions, these figures highlight the scale of time investment tied to complex review systems.

Meta’s previous system includes more detailed categories, ranging from redefining expectations to not meeting expectations. By reducing the number of ratings, the company aims to streamline decision-making and feedback cycles.

An unnamed spokesperson for Meta tells Business Insider: “We're evolving our performance program to simplify it and placing greater emphasis on rewarding outstanding performance. 

"While our employees have always been held to a high-performance, impact-based culture, this new direction allows for more frequent feedback and recognition in a more efficient way."

For HR executives, efficiency is a core theme. Fewer categories reduce calibration time, simplify manager training and make outcomes easier to communicate.

More frequent feedback refers to shorter cycles of performance discussion rather than annual reviews, while recognition links directly to financial reward and visibility.

Managers at Meta previously spent 80 hours a year on performance related tasks (Credit: Getty)

Culture, workforce management and AI capability

Culture at Meta continues to move towards an outcome driven model.

In 2025, the company pledged to cut 5% of its global workforce on the basis of poor performance, following cuts of 10,000 roles in 2023 and 11,000 in 2022.

In November 2025, Meta reportedly announced it will begin assessing employees on their use of AI, with employee’s ability to use AI to deliver results plays a key role in performance reviews in 2026.

While the exact role AI competency plays within Checkpoint remains unclear, the direction aligns performance management with strategic capability.

In January 2026, Meta announces Meta Compute, a decade long initiative to increase AI infrastructure.

The company plans to build ‘tens of gigawatts’ of AI infrastructure over the next 10 years, with ‘hundreds’ of gigawatts built beyond that, according to a statement released by Mark Zuckerberg on Facebook.

For HR leaders, this scale of investment underlines the need to align skills, rewards and performance metrics with long term capability building.

Meta’s focus on better incentives, simplified reviews and AI competency places HR at the centre of organisational execution.

The Checkpoint system links culture, reward and strategy into a single framework, offering a case study for executives assessing how performance management supports business outcomes at scale.

Company portals

Executives